|
Developing Trust
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent has not built a trusting
relationship with the principals. He
has not shown that he trusts or relies on them. In fact, the decision he has made regarding
their roles could imply the opposite.
He has not modeled transparent leadership; instead he has called the
principals to his office and sprung this mandate on them without any prior
indication of his position.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will revisit his
decision and admit his mistake in his approach. He will invite his principals to a meeting
for an open discussion about his reasons for the decision. He will discuss his background as a
principal, so they know he identifies with them. He will conduct the meeting in a relaxed
manor while sitting at their level. He
will then solicit their opinions about his conclusions, be open to their
viewpoints and listen actively to their concerns.
|
|
|
|
Vision
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent may have a vision for
his district, but it is not a vision that is shared or supported by the
principals. His vision does not
coincide with the beliefs of the principals in that they are educators and
not managers. He did not allow for
adequate planning, nor did he establish trust amongst his principals before
taking this action.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will re-examine his
vision for the district and ensure that vision is shared and supported by his
followers. He will start by attempting
to establish a shared trust amongst his principals. He will conduct a series of meetings in
which he will promote a positive climate using proven group dynamic
methods. He will solicit their views
of the vision and how it aligns with their schools. He will use data-driven assessments to
create opportunities that will support the vision rather than short-term
solutions to a current issue.
|
|
Decision Making
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1.
While the superintendent may feel there is a need for his decision, he did
not go about making the decision in an appropriate manner. He did not identify or consider any
alternatives, nor did he collaborate with the persons who would be most
affected by the decision. He used the
autocratic strategy for making the decision in that he made the decision
alone. He may have felt the need for
urgency since the school year was impending, however, he failed to consider
the principals’ buy-in and should have collaborated with them in order to
garner support.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will communicate to his
principals that he has decided to withdraw his decision in order for them all
to further study and evaluate the situation.
He will use a collaborative approach in which he and the principals
will work together to define the problem.
They will perform assessments in order to collect data presenting the
scope of the problem. They will
brainstorm possible alternatives and evaluate those alternatives. Finally they will decide on one alternative
as the solution. The principals will
then be charged with determining a timeline and a means of implementation.
|
|
Communication
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent’s communication with his
principals was one-sided. He summoned
them to his office with no communication as to the reason. He passed out the new guidelines and asked
for questions or thoughts, but he did not respond to any of their concerns.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will take time to
reflect on his communication skills and commit to developing an efficient
two-way communication system with his followers. He will study and practice effective
listening skills. He will allow for
different methods of communication:
one-on-one, email, meetings, etc.
He will establish an open-door policy.
Finally, he will survey his followers to ascertain the efficiency of
his communication methods and take action to improve any weaknesses.
|
|
Conflict and Issue Resolution
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The
superintendent avoided conflict by not acknowledging the objections of the
principals and not responding when there was conflict amongst them. The individual principals are not aware of
the roles and duties of the other principals and so are unable to understand
their positions.
Action to be Taken
1. First the superintendent will address the
issue of role conflict. Principals
will study the job descriptions and performance expectations of their own and
other positions in the district in order to understand the scope of those
positions. Second, the superintendent
will address the issue of his own style of managing conflict. Avoidance is only acceptable when it is
necessary to delay confronting an issue.
In performing the actions noted above, the superintendent will
confront any conflicts and use them as an opportunity to further establish
trust and understanding of opposing sides.
He will ensure that all concerns are heard and will work for a
resolution that will address all sides of the issue.
|
|
Motivating and Developing Others
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent believed that the
principals would be relieved by the fact that they would no longer have to
keep up with observations and conferences, and he might have thought this
would be enough to motivate them to work together as a committee and buy into
his decision. However, his lack of
consideration for their opinion as to their own needs belied any true effort on his part to consider using
effective motivation strategies.
Action to be Taken
1. First, the superintendent will take the
actions outlined above to improve communication in order to foster an
atmosphere of trust. Next, he will
task the principals to ensure that the assessments performed in the
decision-making actions also address the needs of the principals and their
own followers. The superintendent will
reflect on these needs and determine the best way to meet them. As the principals begin to trust the
superintendent again and understand that he is determined to address their needs,
they will be more motivated to follow his lead.
|
|
Group Processes
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent did not model effective
skills in conducting meetings. He did
not convey the purpose of the meeting beforehand, he did not respond to the
principals’ comments and objections, nor did he take action when there was a
conflict.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will communicate the
subject of each meeting and distribute agendas that will include the time,
purpose and location. The agenda will
include time for presentation of concerns.
The superintendent will use listening skills learned in the
communication actions above. He will
establish rules for the meeting so as to allow for the voicing of concerns
but to discourage interruptions and conflict.
However, if conflict does arise he will address it using an
appropriate conflict resolution style.
|
|
Leadership Style
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent uses a directive
leadership style, giving the principals no say in the outcome. Because of this, the principals show very
little support for the mandate.
Action to be Taken
1. The
superintendent will study the different types of leadership style in order to
employ them in a timely and effective manor.
He will adopt a collaborative style for the duration of resolving this
issue. He will be open to the ideas
and suggestion of the principals. He
will empower the principals and encourage their cooperation by delegating
responsibility. He will continue to
practice the listening and communication skills learned in the communication
actions above. He will continue to
build trust by practicing transparent leadership.
|
\
|
Ethical Use of Power
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent has exerted the misuse
of legitimate power. He has used his
power as superintendent to make an autocratic decision and does not empower
the principals by giving them authority to be involved in that decision.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will take the time to get to know the individual
principals. He will learn their
background, their philosophies and allow them to get to know him. He will find ways to work with them in
other areas in order to communicate his belief in their value to the
district. He will work toward a shared vision with them individually and as a
whole. At this point, if the
superintendent has been able to rebuild the
trust of the principals, he will be in a position to exert the good use of
referent power in order to ethically meet the needs of the district.
|
|
Culture and Climate
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent did not take into
account the culture and climate of the individual schools his decisions would
affect, nor did he consider the climate of his own staff of principals.
Action to be Taken
1. The superintendent will conduct appropriate
assessments in order to ascertain the climate and culture of his staff of
principals, as well as the climate and culture of their individual
campuses. The superintendent will
address the concerns outlined in those assessments. Further, by following the actions indicated
in the trust and communication sections above, the superintendent would
endorse an atmosphere of trust, and in doing so, help to develop an improved
culture and climate. Finally, the
superintendent will appropriately address conflict as it arises in order to
ensure a climate of mutual respect and commonality.
|
|
Change
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent has not made sharing
information a priority, and he has not taken steps to ensure that all
involved understand the change and the reasons behind it. He charged the principals with the
responsibility of making sure the changes took place before ensuring he had
their full understanding and buy-in.
He did not address their concerns about the change, nor did he give any
guidance as to how the change would take place.
Action to be Taken
1.
First, the superintendent will effectively communicate the reasons for the
change and ensure that all those affected understand those reasons. Next, he will outline the steps for the
change and a timeline in which those steps will take place. The superintendent will then communicate
the new expectations in regard to the change and solicit feedback. The principal will continue to practice
communication skills outlined above in order to facilitate that feedback and
to continue to build a culture and climate of shared trust.
|
|
Evaluation
|
|
Aspects of the Problem
1. The superintendent based his decision on
his past experience as a principal, recent reading and a review of the schools’
programs. However, the superintendent
did not use an established or data-driven evaluation method to arrive at this
decision.
Action to be Taken
1. The
superintendent will study and develop skills in the area of collecting and
analyzing data. He will work
collaboratively with the principals to establish the definition of the
issue. They will use this definition
to create an assessment tool for the collection of data regarding the
issue. After a full examination of the
data, the superintendent and principals will be able to analyze the issue and
take necessary steps toward its resolution.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment